Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wuxi Multimedia v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, No. 08-1041 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1041
Decided
June 5, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
4 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1041

WUXI MULTIMEDIA LIMITED and

ORIENT POWER (WUXI) DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS, N.V.

(doing business as Philips Intellectual Property and Standards),

Defendant-Appellee, and

SONY CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

PIONEER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

LG ELECTRONICS,

Defendant-Appellee. Anton N. Handal, Handal & Associates, of San Diego, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. William J. Kolasky, Jr., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. were A. Stephen Hut, Jr. and Jonathan G. Cedarbaum. On the brief for Sony Corporation were Joseph Kattan, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, of Washington, DC; and Christopher D. Dusseault, of Los Angeles, California. On the brief for Pioneer Corporation were Jeffrey S. Davidson, Alexander F. MacKinnon, and Corey C. Watson, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Los Angeles, California. On the brief for LG2 Electronics were H. Stephen Harris, Jr., Jones Day, of Atlanta, Georgia; and David R. Clark, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP, of San Diego, California. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of California Judge Dana M. Sabraw

3United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1041

WUXI MULTIMEDIA LIMITED and

ORIENT POWER (WUXI) DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS, N.V.

(doing business as Philips Intellectual Property and Standards),

Defendant-Appellee, and

SONY CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

PIONEER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

LG ELECTRONICS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in CASE NO(S) 04-CV-01136.

4This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (BRYSON and PROST, Circuit Judges, and ZAGEL, District Judge.)∗

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: June 5, 2008 _ /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Footnotes

  1. ∗ Honorable James B. Zagel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wuxi Multimedia v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, No. 08-1041 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1041-20080605
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1041-20080605

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.