Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Advanceme v. Rapidpay, LLC., No. 08-1036 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1036
Decided
May 15, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1036

ADVANCEME, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

RAPIDPAY, LLC,

Defendant,

and

MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC. and REACH FINANCIAL, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Michael N. Edelman, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald S. Lemieux. Of counsel was Douglas E. Olson. Of counsel on the brief was Parris J. Sanz, Capital Access Network, Inc., of Scarsdale, New York. Willem G. Schuurman, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., of Austin, Texas, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Brian K. Buss, Joseph D. Gray, Graham E. Sutliff, and R. Floyd Walker. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judge Leonard Davis

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1036

ADVANCEME, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RAPIDPAY, LLC,

Defendant, and MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC. and REACH FINANCIAL, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 6:05-CV-424 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED May 15, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Advanceme v. Rapidpay, LLC., No. 08-1036 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1036-20080515
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1036-20080515

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.