Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Babu, No. 08-1025 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1025
Decided
July 10, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1025

(Serial No. 10/631,698)

IN RE S.V. BABU, SHARATH HEGDE,

and SUNIL CHANDRA JHA

Susan E. Chetlin, Fennemore Craig, P.C., of Denver, Colorado, for appellants. With her on the brief was Bruce E. Dahl. Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley and Heather F. Auyang, Associate Solicitors. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1025

(Serial No. 10/631,698)

IN RE S.V. BABU, SHARATH HEGDE,

and SUNIL CHANDRA JHA,

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent & Trademark Office, Board of Patent

Appeals and Interferences.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, BRYSON and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly__________________________

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Babu, No. 08-1025 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1025-20080710
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1025-20080710

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.