Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sumitomo Mitsubishi Silicon Corp. v. Memc Electronic Materials Inc., No. 07-1578 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1578
Decided
December 5, 2008
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1578

SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORPORATION (also known as Sumco),

and SUMCO USA CORPORATION (also known as Sumco USA),

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

R. Terrance Rader, Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Linda Dupont Mettes and Leigh C. Taggart. Robert M. Evans, Jr. Senniger Powers LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David W. Harlan and Marc W. Vander Tuig. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1578

SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORPORATION (also known as Sumco),

and SUMCO USA CORPORATION (also known as Sumco USA),

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 05-CV-2133, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.

DECIDED: December 5, 2008

Before NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

The court concludes that jurisdiction of this appeal is properly with the Federal Circuit, for the right to relief depends on resolution of a substantial question of patent law.

On the merits, in accordance with Federal Circuit Rule 36 we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sumitomo Mitsubishi Silicon Corp. v. Memc Electronic Materials Inc., No. 07-1578 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1578-20081205
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1578-20081205

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.