Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Craig v. Foldfast Inc., No. 07-1570 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1570
Decided
March 4, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1570

JASON S. CRAIG,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

FOLDFAST, INC. and HSN, L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees. Stanley B. Kita, Howson & Howson LLP, of Fort Washington, Philadelphia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Martin B. Woods, Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Mark D. Bowen. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge K. Michael Moore

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1570

JASON S. CRAIG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FOLDFAST, INC. and HSN, L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-61009. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, GAJARSA and MOORE, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _March 4, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Craig v. Foldfast Inc., No. 07-1570 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1570-20080304
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1570-20080304

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.