Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Airgo IP, LLC. v. Arvinmeritor, No. 07-1538 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1538
Decided
May 15, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1538

AIRGO IP, LLC

and AIRGO SYSTEMS, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

ARVINMERITOR, INC.,

PRESSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EQUALAIRE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Don O. Burley, and Denise W. DeFranco, of Cambridge, Massachuetts. Of counsel on the brief was Daniel P. Dooley, Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Edward C. DuMont, Eric R. Columbus, and Dutch D. Chung, of Washington, DC, and Noah A. Levine, of New York, New York. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Judge David L. Russell

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1538

AIRGO IP, LLC

and AIRGO SYSTEMS, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ARVINMERITOR, INC.,

PRESSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EQUALAIRE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of

Oklahoma

in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1405 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER and SCHALL) Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 15, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Airgo IP, LLC. v. Arvinmeritor, No. 07-1538 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1538-20080515
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1538-20080515

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.