Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sanofi-Aventis v. Teva Pharma, No. 07-1521 (Fed. Cir. July 30, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1521
Decided
July 30, 2009
Judge
Mayer, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1521

SANOFI-AVENTIS, SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, INC., and

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB SANOFI

PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDING PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, V.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

New York in case no. 04-CV-7548, Judge Sidney H. Stein.

ON MOTION

Before MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

Sanofi-Aventis et al. (Sanofi) submit correspondence that the court treats as a motion for summary affirmance and issuance of the mandate. Sanofi states that Teva Phamaceuticals USA, Inc. consents.

This appeal was stayed pending the court's disposition of Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex, 2007-1438. In Apotex the court affirmed the district court's ruling that Sanofi's patent was not invalid. Sanofi states that Sanofi and Teva agree that, in light of the court's disposition in Apotex, this appeal should be disposed of by issuance of a mandate affirming the trial court's decision.

2(cid:9)

Figure on page 2 of the opinion
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is summarily affirmed and the mandate is issued herewith.

Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 3 0 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:(cid:9) Evan R. Chesler, Esq.

Daniel F. Attridge, Esq.

s17(cid:9) U.S. COURTn0F

LEARTALS

FOR THE

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

3 0 2009

JUL(cid:9)

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: JUL 3 0 2009

All 'MOLY CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sanofi-Aventis v. Teva Pharma, No. 07-1521 (Fed. Cir. July 30, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1521-20090730
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1521-20090730

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.