Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. v. Perrigo Co., No. 07-1508 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 14, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1508
Decided
April 14, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1508

MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MERCK & CO., INC., and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON – MERCK CONSUMER PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

PERRIGO COMPANY, L. PERRIGO COMPANY,

and PERRIGO RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees. Harry J. Roper, Jenner & Block LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Raymond N. Nimrod and Kristopher R. Kiel. Of counsel on the brief was Ronald M. Daignault, of New York, New York. Steven L. Underwood, Price, Heneveld, Cooper, DeWitt & Litton, LLP, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were James A. Mitchell and Andrea Z. Warmbier. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge William H. Pauley, III

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1508

MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MERCK & CO., INC., and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON – MERCK CONSUMER PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

PERRIGO COMPANY, L. PERRIGO COMPANY,

and PERRIGO RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1321 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED April 14, 2008 _/s/ Jan Horbaly___________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. v. Perrigo Co., No. 07-1508 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 14, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1508-20080414
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1508-20080414

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.