United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1370, -1402
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY,
Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
Defendants-Appellants, and
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
Daniel A. Boehnen, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Christopher M. Cavan and Sean M. Sullivan. Kenneth R. Adamo, Jones Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellant General Electric Company. With him on the brief were Lawrence D. Rosenberg, of Washington, DC, and Susan M. Gerber, of Cleveland, Ohio. Of counsel were Gerald R. Ross and Douglas R. Cole, of Atlanta, Georgia. Richard L. Stroup, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al. With him on the brief were Don O. Burley, Gerson S. Panitch, Parmanand K. Sharma, and Andrew C. Sonu. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Judge Robert Holmes Bell
2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1370, -1402
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY,
Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
Defendants-Appellants, and
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of
Michigan
In CASE NO(S). 1:04-CV-100. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: _October 10, 2008__ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk