Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MGM Well Services v. Mega Lift Systems, No. 07-1367 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1367
Decided
February 19, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1367

MGM WELL SERVICES, INC,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MEGA LIFT SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

J. Dean Lechtenberger, Howrey LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Richard L. Stanley, Eric S. Schlichter, and Tyler T. VanHoutan.

Charles W. Alworth, Alworth Law & Engineering, of Tyler, Texas, argued for defendant-appellant. Appeal from: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Nancy F. Atlas

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1367

MGM WELL SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MEGA LIFT SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1634 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _February 19, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MGM Well Services v. Mega Lift Systems, No. 07-1367 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1367-20080219
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1367-20080219

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.