Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Neutrino Development Corp. v. Sonosite, No. 07-1325 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1325
Decided
March 14, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1325

NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

and

RICHARD T. REDANO,

Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee,

v.

SONOSITE, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant. William C. Norvell, Jr., Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim-defendant appellee. With him on the brief were Scott D. Marrs and Brian T. Bagley. Paul E. Krieger, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant. With him on the brief were Lucas T. Elliot, William J. Boyce, and C. Erik Hawes. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern of Texas Judge John D. Rainey

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1325

NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

and

RICHARD T. REDANO,

Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 01-2484 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED March 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly____________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Neutrino Development Corp. v. Sonosite, No. 07-1325 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1325-20080314
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1325-20080314

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.