Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Invisible Fence v. Perimeter Technologies, No. 07-1318 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1318
Decided
January 8, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1318, -1319

INVISIBLE FENCE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PERIMETER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. Larry L. Barnard, Carson Boxberger LLP, of Fort Wayne, Indiana, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jon A. Bragalone. Gregory F. Ahrens, Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was John P. Davis. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1318, -1319

INVISIBLE FENCE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PERIMETER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA in CASE NO(S). 1:05-CV-361 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: January 8, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Invisible Fence v. Perimeter Technologies, No. 07-1318 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1318-20080108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1318-20080108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.