Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Prism Technologies v. Verisign, No. 07-1315 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1315
Decided
February 6, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
4 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1315

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

VERISIGN, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, . and

RSA SECURITY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

NETEGRITY, INC.

and COMPUTER ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees, and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. David P. Swenson, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Ronald J. Schutz, Aziz Burgy, and Christopher J. Kuhlman. John M. DiMatteo, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for defendant-appellee Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. were Steven H. Reisberg and Leslie M. Spencer. On the brief for defendant-appellee Verisign, Inc. were Frank C. Cimino, Jr. and Daniel E. Yonan, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Washington, DC, and Jason A. Snyderman and John D. Simmons, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On the brief for defendant-appellee RSA Security, Inc. were Mark D Selwyn, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and2 Dorr LLP, of Palo Alto, California, and William F. Lee, David B. Bassett, Donald R. Steinberg, and Gregory P. Teran, of Boston, Massachusetts. On the brief for defendants-appellees, Netegrity, Inc., et al, were David M. Schlitz, Baker Botts LLP, of Washington, DC, and Samir A. Bhavsar and Jeffrey D. Baxter, of Dallas, Texas. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

3United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1315

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

VERISIGN, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

RSA SECURITY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

NETEGRITY, INC.

and COMPUTER ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-214. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

4ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, BRYSON and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _February 6, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Prism Technologies v. Verisign, No. 07-1315 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1315-20080206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1315-20080206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.