Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sanitec Industries Inc. v. Micro-Waste Corp., No. 07-1282 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1282
Decided
October 9, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1282, -1283

SANITEC INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

MICRO-WASTE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. John M. Delehanty, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Timur E. Slonim. Alan B. Daughtry, Jackson Walker L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was Richard E. Griffin. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Senior Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr.

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1282, -1283

SANITEC INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICRO-WASTE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas In CASE NO(S). 04-CV-3066. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, SCHALL, and MOORE, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATE: October 9, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sanitec Industries Inc. v. Micro-Waste Corp., No. 07-1282 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1282-20081009
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1282-20081009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.