Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wavestream v. CAP Wireless, No. 07-1264 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1264
Decided
December 7, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1264

WAVESTREAM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CAP WIRELESS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Charles S. Barquist, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Anthony L. Press, and Brian F. McMahon. Robert E. Camors, Jr., Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David B. Ritchie, and Richard S. Swope. Of counsel was Nguyen Huu Nguyen. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1264

WAVESTREAM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CAP WIRELESS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4254. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and LOURIE, Circuit Judge):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: December 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wavestream v. CAP Wireless, No. 07-1264 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1264-20071207
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1264-20071207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.