Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gubb v. P&M Services Inc., No. 07-1263 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2008)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1263
Decided
March 4, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1263

MARTIN GUBB,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

P&M SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Marc Lorelli, Brooks Kushman P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Mark A. Cantor. Mark S. Demorest, Demorest Law Firm, PPLC, of Birmingham, Michigan, argued for defendant-appellant. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Senior Judge Julian Abele Cook, Jr.

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1263

MARTIN GUBB,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

P&M SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

In CASE NO(S). 2:04-CV-72432. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, GAJARSA and MOORE, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _March 4, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gubb v. P&M Services Inc., No. 07-1263 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1263-20080304
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1263-20080304

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error