Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Amini Innovation Corporation v. Anthony California, Inc., No. 07-1182 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1182
Decided
November 13, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1182

AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG,

Defendants-Appellees.

Mark D. Nielsen, Cislo & Thomas LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Daniel M. Cislo and Kelly W. Cunningham. Edward F. O’Connor, O’Connor Christensen & McLaughlin, Trial Division of The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief were Thomas T. Chan, Ronald M. St. Marie, and Lisa A. Karczewski, Chan Law Group LLP, of Los Angeles, California. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1182

AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG,

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of

California

In CASE NO(S). 03-CV-8749. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and MOORE, Circuit Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: November 13, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Amini Innovation Corporation v. Anthony California, Inc., No. 07-1182 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1182-20071113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1182-20071113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.