Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Venture Industries Corporation v. Autoliv ASP, No. 07-1118 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1118
Decided
July 11, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1118

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, VEMCO, INC.,

PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.),

Defendant-Appellant. John E. Anding, Drew, Cooper & Anding, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was Thomas V. Hubbard. Peter E. Greene, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Cyrus Amir-Mokri. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Senior Judge Avern Cohn

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1118

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, VEMCO, INC.,

PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in CASE NO(S). 2:99-CV-75354 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: July 11, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Venture Industries Corporation v. Autoliv ASP, No. 07-1118 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1118-20070711
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1118-20070711

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.