Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Rodger Burrows, No. 07-1091 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1091
Decided
August 9, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Corrected: August 9, 2007

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1091

(Serial No. 09/910,654)

IN RE RODGER BURROWS

Richard M. Saccocio, Richard M. Saccocio, P.A., of Plantation, Florida, argued for appellant. Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief was William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1091

(Serial No. 09/910,654)

IN RE RODGER BURROWS

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL, Circuit Judges, FARNAN, JR., District Judge1).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 9, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Footnotes

  1. 1 Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Rodger Burrows, No. 07-1091 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1091-20070809
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1091-20070809

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.