Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Systems General Corp. v. ITC, No. 07-1082 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1082
Decided
November 19, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1082

SYSTEM GENERAL CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Intervenor.

J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. On the brief was Elizabeth A. Niemeyer. Michelle Walters, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Wayne W. Herrington, Assistant General Counsel. Howard G. Pollack, Fish & Richardson P.C. , of Redwood City, California, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were Michael R. Headley, and Frank E. Scherkenbach, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel were Tamara Fraizer, of Redwood City, California, and William E. Sekyi, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States International Trade Commission

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1082 SYSTEM GENERAL CORP.,

Appellant,

v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Intervenor.

JUDGMENT

ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission In CASE NO(S). 337-TA-541 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36 Per Curiam (NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge).

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: November 19, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Systems General Corp. v. ITC, No. 07-1082 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1082-20071119
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1082-20071119

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.