Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nike v. Meitac International Enterprise Co., Ltd, No. 07-1070 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 26, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1070
Decided
March 26, 2007
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1070

NIKE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MEITAC INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.

and MAN LEE MO,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

IN SHOE, INC.,

Defendant.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Nike, Inc. moves to dismiss this appeal because Meitac International Enterprise Co., Ltd. et. al. (Meitac) has failed to file their opening brief. Meitac has not responded. A party’s failure to comply with the court’s rules, including the requirements of preparing and filing briefs, can result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989). Accordingly,

2IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. (2) All sides shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 19, 2007 /s/ Sharon Prost Date Sharon Prost Circuit Judge cc: Erik S. Maurer, Esq. Ronald M. St. Marie, Esq. s19 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: ______________________

2007-1070 2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nike v. Meitac International Enterprise Co., Ltd, No. 07-1070 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 26, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1070-20070326
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1070-20070326

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.