Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Darrin Benzer, No. 07-1069 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1069
Decided
September 17, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1069

(Serial No. 10/145,408)

IN RE DARRIN BENZER

Mirut Dalal, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Christopher C. Winslade. Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor, Solicitor’s Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee. Of counsel were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor and Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1069 (Serial No. 10/145,408)

IN RE DARRIN BENZER

JUDGMENT

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences In CASE NO(S). Serial No. 10/145,408 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36 Per Curiam (NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge).

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: September 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Darrin Benzer, No. 07-1069 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1069-20070917
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1069-20070917

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.