Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Caritas Technoligies, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation, No. 07-1057 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1057
Decided
August 17, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1057

CARITAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

COMCAST IP PHONE, LLC (doing business as Comcast Digital Voice), and COMCAST IP PHONE II, LLC, (doing business as Comcast Digital Voice),

Defendants-Appellees. Kerry L. Timbers, Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Carl Bromberg, Karen A. Buchanan, and Meredith L. Ainbinder. Daralyn J. Durie, Keker & Van Nest LLP, of San Fransisco, California, argued for defendanst-appellees. With him on the brief were Asim M. Bhansali, and Matthias A. Kamber. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judge David J. Folsom

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1057

CARITAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

COMCAST IP PHONE, LLC (doing business as Corncast Digital Voice), and COMCAST IP PHONE II, LLC, (doing business as Corncast Digital Voice),

Defendants-Appellees.

JUDGMENT

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Texas

In CASE NO(S). 2:05-CV-339 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Caritas Technoligies, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation, No. 07-1057 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1057-20070817
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1057-20070817

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.