Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Parker v. Microsoft, No. 07-1017 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 07-1017
Decided
January 10, 2007
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1017

CHARLES W. PARKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Charles W. Parker, of Durham, North Carolina, pro se. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr.

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1017

CHARLES W. PARKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

DECIDED: January 10, 2007

Before LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Charles W. Parker (“Parker”) appeals a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissing his patent infringement action against Microsoft Corporation as frivolous. Parker v. Microsoft Corp., No. 06-CV-00540 (D.D.C. Mar. 23, 2006). We review a district court’s frivolousness determination for an abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernadez, 504 U.S. 24, 32 (1992). Parker’s allegations that he has patented the “elemental atom” and that Microsoft has infringed his rights by using and improperly claiming inventorship of such an invention are “fanciful,” “fantastic,” and “delusional” contentions supporting the district court’s determination. Id. at 33-34. On appeal, Parker provides us with no persuasive basis to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the action. We affirm.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Parker v. Microsoft, No. 07-1017 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-07-1017-20070110
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-07-1017-20070110

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.