Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Capital Bridge v. IVL Technologies, No. 06-1637 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 06-1637
Decided
August 10, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1637

CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee, and

MEMCORP, INC. and CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendants.

Brian L. Wamsley, Goodwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Anthony H. Handal, Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, of New York, New York. Daniel P. Burke, Daniel P. Burke & Associates, PLLC, of Hauppauge, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Georgia Damoulakis. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth M. Karas

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1637

CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MEMCORP, INC. And CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

New York

in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-4002 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL, Circuit Judge, and BUCKLOi,

District Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Footnotes

  1. i Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Capital Bridge v. IVL Technologies, No. 06-1637 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-06-1637-20070810
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-06-1637-20070810

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.