Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies, No. 06-1583 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 06-1583
Decided
August 8, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1583, -1595

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants, v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC,

Counterclaimant-Appellant. Jeffrey M. Fisher, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were John L. Cooper, Andrew Leibnitz, and Nan E. Joesten. John M. Desmarais, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and counterclaimant defendant-appellant. With him on brief were Robert A. Appleby, Alan S. Kellman, Anne S. Toker, and Jason S. Grauch. Of counsel was Edward C. Donovan, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Jeremy Fogel

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1583, 1595

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants, v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC,

Counterclaimant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In CASE NO(S). 01-CV-20709. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 8, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies, No. 06-1583 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-06-1583-20070808
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-06-1583-20070808

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.