Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Postx Corporation v. Secure Data in Motion, Inc (Doing Business as Sigaba), No. 06-1565 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2007)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 06-1565
Decided
August 17, 2007
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1565, -1566

POSTX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and

MAYFIELD PRINCIPALS FUND II, MAYFIELD XI QUALIFIED,

MAYFIELD XI, MAYFIELD IX, L.P., MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND VI,

and MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND IV, L.P.,

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v.

SECURE DATA IN MOTION, INC.

(doing business as Sigaba),

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. George M. Sirilla, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee, PostX Corporation, and counterclaim defendants-appellees, Mayfield Principals Fund II, et al. With him on the brief were Joseph R. Tiffany II and John M. Grenfell, of Palo Alto, California, and Kevin T. Kramer, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief was William F. Abrams, Bingham McCutchen LLP, of Palo Alto, California. John L. Cooper, Farella Braun and Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant, Secure Data in Motion, Inc. (doing business as Sigaba). With him on the brief were Jeffrey M. Fisher and Stephanie Powers Skaff. Of counsel were Eric W. Bass and James W. Morando. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Susan Illston

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1565, -1566

POSTX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and

MAYFIELD PRINCIPALS FUND II, MAYFIELD XI QUALIFIED,

MAYFIELD XI, MAYFIELD IX, L.P., MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND VI,

and MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND IV, L.P.,

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v.

SECURE DATA IN MOTION, INC.

(doing business as Sigaba),

Defendant/Counterciaimant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California

in CASE NO(S). 02-CV-04483 and 03-CV-00521 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Postx Corporation v. Secure Data in Motion, Inc (Doing Business as Sigaba), No. 06-1565 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2007).

Record ID
CAFC-06-1565-20070817
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-06-1565-20070817

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.