Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gyory v. Reebok International, Ltd., No. 04-1516 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2005)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 04-1516
Decided
February 14, 2005
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

04-1516

KÁLMÁN GYÖRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee. DECIDED: February 14, 2005 Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Kálmán Györy (“Györy”) appeals the dismissal of his suit against Reebok International, Ltd. (“Reebok”) for alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 4,134,156 (“the ’156 patent”). Györy v. Reebok Int’l Ltd., No. 03-CV-10077 (D. Mass. June 4, 2004). We affirm. With the benefit of an earlier application, Györy’s ’156 patent claimed priority from June 11, 1976, and it issued on January 16, 1979. Under 35 U.S.C. § 154(c)(1), the term of the ’156 patent expired on June 11, 1996. Györy commenced this action on2 January 6, 2003. Because “no recovery shall be had for any infringement committed more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint,” 35 U.S.C. § 286, and because an act must be performed “during the term of the patent” to constitute an act of infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Györy cannot recover and his complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim. We have considered Reebok’s request for attorney fees, and we decline to award them.

04-1516 2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gyory v. Reebok International, Ltd., No. 04-1516 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2005).

Record ID
CAFC-04-1516-20050214
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-04-1516-20050214

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.